Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-10

U/A 317 (1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA vs R/O DR.H.B.MIRDHA,CHAIRMAN

Citation / case number
SC 2003/60981
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U/A 317 (1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
Respondent
R/O DR.H.B.MIRDHA,CHAIRMAN
Author
M. Panchal
Bench
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN,P. SATHASIVAM,J.M. PANCHAL, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in a reference under Article 317(1) of the Constitution, examined the conduct of Dr. H.B. Mirdha, Chairman of the Orissa Public Service Commission, regarding his failure to disclose the candidacy of his daughters for the Orissa Civil Services Examination. The Court held that Dr. Mirdha's actions constituted a breach of the duty to maintain impartiality and integrity in the examination process, thereby warranting disciplinary action. The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in public service appointments and examinations.

U/A 317 (1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA vs R/O DR.H.B.MIRDHA,CHAIRMAN · Niyam