RAMAVILASOM GRANDHASALA REP.BY SECY.&ANR vs N.S.S. KARAYOGAM

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with the First Appellate Court's finding regarding the status of Yuva Samithi under Section 96 C.P.C., which is limited to errors of law, not fact. The Court emphasized that the High Court should have examined the evidence, specifically Exhibits B-1 to B-7, before making its determination. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the case was remanded for reconsideration, allowing the First Appellate Court to reassess the factual findings regarding the functioning of Yuva Samithi.