Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-07

STATE OF U.P. vs MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY

Citation / case number
SC 2001/11468
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,C.K. THAKKER,D.K. JAIN, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's dismissal of the State's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent under Sections 376 and 323 IPC was unsustainable. The Court emphasized that the mere fact that the prosecutrix was above 16 years of age cannot imply consent without evidence. It reiterated that the prosecution's duty to explain delays in lodging FIR does not apply in rape cases. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted the matter for fresh hearing with detailed consideration.

STATE OF U.P. vs MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY · Niyam