Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-18

Mukul Saikia & Ors vs State Of Assam & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 747
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mukul Saikia & Ors
Respondent
State Of Assam & Ors
Author
Lokeshwar Singh Panta
Bench
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Gauhati High Court, affirming that the appellants could not claim appointment to the posts of Child Development Project Officers (CDPOs) as their names appeared below the selected candidates in the merit list published by the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) on 17.07.2000. The Court emphasized that the select list had exhausted with the appointment of the 27 candidates, and any future vacancies could not be filled by those who were not selected. The Court held that the regularization of services for certain candidates was a valid policy decision by the State and did not violate recruitment rules under the Assam Public Service Commission (Limitation of Function) Regulation, 1951.

Mukul Saikia & Ors vs State Of Assam & Ors · Niyam