Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-03

Parvinderjit Singh & Anr vs State (U.T. Chandigarh) & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 502
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Parvinderjit Singh & Anr
Respondent
State (U.T. Chandigarh) & Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
C.K. Thakker, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Punjab and Haryana High Court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case involving allegations of embezzlement under Sections 406, 420, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Court held that the allegations were serious and not merely civil in nature, affirming the High Court's decision that the appellants did not merit protection under Section 438. The outcome was the dismissal of the appeals for anticipatory bail.

Parvinderjit Singh & Anr vs State (U.T. Chandigarh) & Anr · Niyam