Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-21

Abhimanyoo Ram vs State Of U.P.& Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Abhimanyoo Ram
Respondent
State Of U.P.& Anr
Author
R. V. Raveendran
Bench
J. M. Panchal, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed was valid, and the explicit directions regarding the consequences of such dismissal were necessary to prevent misuse of interim orders. The Court clarified that the appellant's assumption of an unconditional dismissal was incorrect, as the High Court merely articulated the implications of the dismissal, including the potential revocation of any selection made under the interim order. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity of judicial processes.

Abhimanyoo Ram vs State Of U.P.& Anr · Niyam