Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-03

Pundlik Jalam Patil (D) By Lrs vs Exe.Eng. Jalgaon Medium Project & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pundlik Jalam Patil (D) By Lrs
Respondent
Exe.Eng. Jalgaon Medium Project & Anr
Author
B.Sudershan Reddy
Bench
S.H. Kapadia, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the Bombay High Court's order condoning a delay of 1724 days in filing appeals under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Court emphasized that the High Court's acceptance of the respondent's explanation for the delay was not justified, as the reasons provided were insufficient to warrant such a lengthy delay. Consequently, the appeals were allowed without costs, reinstating the original award of the Reference Court regarding land acquisition compensation.

Pundlik Jalam Patil (D) By Lrs vs Exe.Eng. Jalgaon Medium Project & Anr · Niyam