Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-11-06

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Mumbai vs M/S. National Organic Chemical ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commnr. Of Central Excise, Mumbai
Respondent
M/S. National Organic Chemical ...
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Exemption Notification No. 217/86 CE under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, specifically regarding the captively consumed ethylene and propylene used in manufacturing products under chapters 27 and 29. The Court held that while ethylene and propylene used in the manufacture of goods under chapter 29 are exempt from excise duty, those used for products under chapter 27 are not exempt and thus attract duty. Consequently, the demand for excise duty on the inputs used for chapter 27 products was upheld, affirming the show-cause notices issued to the respondent assessee.

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Mumbai vs M/S. National Organic Chemical ... · Niyam