Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-12

R.K. SHUKLA vs SUDHRIST NARAIN ANAND

Citation / case number
SC 2004/27031
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R.K. SHUKLA
Respondent
SUDHRIST NARAIN ANAND
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of allotment of a disputed premises under the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, specifically focusing on the procedure for determining vacancy and the rights of the landlord and applicants. The Court held that the Rent Control and Eviction Officer must consider the actual occupation of the premises before allotting it to another party, emphasizing that the presence of the landlord and the lack of other applicants during hearings are critical factors. The Court ultimately ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the applications for allotment due to the respondent's established occupation of the premises.

R.K. SHUKLA vs SUDHRIST NARAIN ANAND · Niyam