Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-09

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BELGAUM vs M/S. MYSORE KIRLOSKAR LTD.,KARNATAKA

Citation / case number
SC 2002/16563
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BELGAUM
Respondent
M/S. MYSORE KIRLOSKAR LTD.,KARNATAKA
Author
M. PANCHAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court set aside the order of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, which had upheld the demand of duty of Rs.7,41,750 and a penalty of Rs.75,000 imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Rule 6(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court held that the amount of Rs.43 lakhs received by the respondent for designs and tooling could not be included in the value of the machines manufactured, as it was accounted as other income and not part of the sale price. The judgment clarified the interpretation of 'value' under the Central Excise framework, leading to the conclusion that the duty was improperly levied.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BELGAUM vs M/S. MYSORE KIRLOSKAR LTD.,KARNATAKA · Niyam