BAJAJ AUTO LTD. vs DIRECTOR GENERAL (I&R)

The Supreme Court examined the allegations against Bajaj Auto Limited under the Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, specifically Sections 33(1)(b), 33(1)(f), and 33(1)(g). The Court held that the agreements in question imposed restrictive trade practices by limiting dealer operations, fixing sales targets, and controlling resale prices, thereby violating the provisions of the Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commission's findings regarding the restrictive practices of the appellant.