Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-16

MALLAVARAPU KASIVISWESWARA RAO vs THADIKONDA RAMULU FIRM .

Citation / case number
SC 2000/5213
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MALLAVARAPU KASIVISWESWARA RAO
Respondent
THADIKONDA RAMULU FIRM .
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court affirming the decree for recovery of Rs. 2,33,125/- along with interest at 18% from the date of the suit, based on the execution of pronotes by the respondents. The Court found that the respondents failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of forgery regarding the pronotes. The ruling emphasized the importance of proving the execution of documents in contractual disputes, thereby affirming the lower court's decision in favor of the appellant.

MALLAVARAPU KASIVISWESWARA RAO vs THADIKONDA RAMULU FIRM . · Niyam