Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-15

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. (Now Known As ... vs Director General (Investigation And ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 399
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. (Now Known As ...
Respondent
Director General (Investigation And ...
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the findings of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission regarding the appellants' engagement in restrictive trade practices under Section 2(o)(ii) and Section 33(1)(b) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Court found that the appellants imposed unjustified conditions on the supply of goods, thereby manipulating market conditions and restricting competition. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commission's order against the appellants.

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. (Now Known As ... vs Director General (Investigation And ... · Niyam