Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-07

M. Natarajan vs State By Inspector Of Police, Spe, Cbi, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 785
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. Natarajan
Respondent
State By Inspector Of Police, Spe, Cbi, ...
Author
V.S. Sirpurkar
Bench
P.P. Naolekar, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's revision petitions by the Madras High Court, affirming that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the appellant under Sections 120B, 420, 468, and 471 IPC, as well as Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Court emphasized that the involvement in a conspiracy to cheat the Customs Department was adequately demonstrated through the actions of the appellant and co-accused. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, maintaining the High Court's ruling.

M. Natarajan vs State By Inspector Of Police, Spe, Cbi, ... · Niyam