Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-01

Commissioner Of Central Excise, New ... vs India Thermit Corporation Ltd. & Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 369
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, New ...
Respondent
India Thermit Corporation Ltd. & Others
Author
Ashok Bhan
Bench
Ashok Bhan, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, under Section 35-L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, upheld the Tribunal's decision to set aside the Commissioner’s order demanding differential excise duty from M/s India Thermit Corporation Ltd. and M/s Asiatic Thermics Ltd. The Court found that the classification of goods and the imposition of penalties were not justified based on the evidence presented. The ruling clarified that misclassification and under-valuation must be substantiated with clear evidence of intent to evade duty, which was not established in this case.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, New ... vs India Thermit Corporation Ltd. & Others · Niyam