Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-08

Satna Stone & Lime Co. Ltd., M.P. Etc vs Union Of India & Another Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2928
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satna Stone & Lime Co. Ltd., M.P. Etc
Respondent
Union Of India & Another Etc
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the arbitration award in favor of Satna Stone & Lime Co. was improperly upheld by the High Court, as the claim was barred by limitation under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court emphasized that the arbitrator's decision must align with established legal principles, and if it contradicts the law, the court is justified in interfering. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to reject the arbitrator's award based on incorrect legal principles.

Satna Stone & Lime Co. Ltd., M.P. Etc vs Union Of India & Another Etc · Niyam