Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-16

Mallavarapu Kasivisweswara Rao vs Thadikonda Ramulu Firm & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2898
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mallavarapu Kasivisweswara Rao
Respondent
Thadikonda Ramulu Firm & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court affirming the decree for recovery of Rs. 2,33,125/- with interest under the pronotes executed by the respondents. The Court found that the execution of the pronotes was established despite the respondents' claims of forgery, as they failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their allegations. The judgment reinforced the principle that the burden of proof lies on the party alleging forgery, and the appellant was entitled to recover the amounts due along with interest as per the terms of the pronotes.

Mallavarapu Kasivisweswara Rao vs Thadikonda Ramulu Firm & Ors · Niyam