Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-16

Paresh P.Rajda vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2357
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Paresh P.Rajda
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Author
Harjit Singh Bedi
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a director can be held liable for dishonoured cheques if specific allegations of responsibility are made against them, as per Section 141 of the Act. The Court found that the High Court's dismissal of the accused's application was justified, as the complaint contained sufficient allegations attributing responsibility to the accused as officers of the company. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's decision to proceed with the case against the accused.

Paresh P.Rajda vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam