Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-14

Bhupendra vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2306
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bhupendra
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981. The Court found that the detaining authority had sufficient grounds to establish a live link between the detenu's past activities and the need for preventive detention, despite the appellant's claims of stale incidents and lack of public order disturbance. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision, emphasizing the effectiveness of preventive measures taken against the detenu prior to detention.

Bhupendra vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam