Bajaj Auto Ltd vs Director General (I&R) & Anr

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission's judgment regarding Bajaj Auto Limited's alleged restrictive trade practices under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Court examined Sections 2(o), 33(1)(b), 33(1)(f), and 33(1)(g) of the Act, concluding that the practices in question did not constitute restrictive trade practices as defined. The Court upheld the appellant's position, ruling in favor of Bajaj Auto Limited and dismissing the allegations against it.