Bajaj Auto Ltd vs Director General (I&R;) & Anr

The Supreme Court examined the appeal against the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission's ruling regarding Bajaj Auto Limited's alleged restrictive trade practices under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Court analyzed Sections 2(o), 33(1)(b), 33(1)(f), and 33(1)(g) of the Act, determining that the practices in question did not constitute restrictive trade practices as defined. The Court upheld the appellant's position, ruling in favor of Bajaj Auto Limited and dismissing the allegations against it.