Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-07

Union Of India (Uoi) vs S.P. Singh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India (Uoi)
Respondent
S.P. Singh
Author
Harjit Singh Bedi
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 48(1)(a) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, the respondent's application for voluntary retirement was deemed effective as the three-month notice period expired on 31st August 2005, prior to the communication of the suspension order. The Court emphasized that an order must be communicated to the affected individual to be binding, and since the suspension order was not communicated until 2nd September 2005, the respondent was entitled to retire from service effective 1st September 2005. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the respondent.

Union Of India (Uoi) vs S.P. Singh · Niyam