Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-08

Savithramma vs Deputy Commnr., Mandya Distt. & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Savithramma
Respondent
Deputy Commnr., Mandya Distt. & Ors
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench of the High Court failed to provide a speaking and reasoned order as required under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The Court emphasized the necessity for a reasoned judgment to ensure transparency and accountability in judicial proceedings. Consequently, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the High Court for a reasoned decision within three months.

Savithramma vs Deputy Commnr., Mandya Distt. & Ors · Niyam