Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-05-15

Commissioner Of Cent.Excise, ... vs M/S. Karnataka Agro Chemicals

Citation / case number
2008 AIR SCW 7999
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Cent.Excise, ...
Respondent
M/S. Karnataka Agro Chemicals
Author
S.H. Kapadia
Bench
B. Sudershan Reddy, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the classification of 'micronutrient' compounds for excise duty under the Central Excise Tariff, specifically CSH 3105.00 and CSH 3808.20. The Court upheld the CESTAT's decision that the respondent-assessee's 'multi micronutrient' products qualify as fertilizers under CSH 3105.00, as they contain nitrogen, an essential constituent per Explanatory Note 6 to Chapter 31. Consequently, the appeals by the Department were dismissed, affirming the classification of the products as fertilizers.

Commissioner Of Cent.Excise, ... vs M/S. Karnataka Agro Chemicals · Niyam