Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-14

BHIKHUBHAI VITHLABHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/9775
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHIKHUBHAI VITHLABHAI PATEL
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT .
Author
SUDERSHAN REDDY
Bench
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY S.H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976, specifically Section 21, the State and appropriate authority cannot infringe upon the substantial rights of landowners by revising development plans without due process. The Court emphasized that the designation of land lapses after a certain period if not acted upon, and the rights of landowners to have their land defreezed under Section 22 cannot be disregarded. The appeal was allowed, reversing the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' cross-objections.

BHIKHUBHAI VITHLABHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT . · Niyam