MONI SHANKAR vs UNION OF INDIA

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant, a Booking Supervisor with the Central Railways, were flawed due to non-compliance with the Railway Vigilance Manual and the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, specifically Rule 9(21). The Court found that the trap laid for the appellant did not adhere to the required procedures, as it lacked the presence of independent witnesses and failed to provide adequate evidence for the charges. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to quash the disciplinary action taken against the appellant, thereby restoring his position and pay.