Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-26

KANAGAVALLIAMMAL vs R.BALASUBRAMANIAN

Citation / case number
SC 2007/5093
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KANAGAVALLIAMMAL
Respondent
R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Execution Petition No. 177 of 1995 was not a continuation of the earlier Execution Petition No. 369 of 1986, thus the limitation period under the Pondicherry Limitation (Repeal of Local Law) Act, 1994 was applicable. The Court interpreted Section 4(b)(i) of the Act, clarifying that the Execution Petition filed beyond the stipulated 90 days was barred by limitation. Consequently, the dismissal of the Revision Petition by the Madras High Court was upheld, affirming the executing court's decision.

KANAGAVALLIAMMAL vs R.BALASUBRAMANIAN · Niyam