Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-10

A.K. SHARMA vs CHAIRMAN/M.D.,HPGCL .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/12354
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.K. SHARMA
Respondent
CHAIRMAN/M.D.,HPGCL .
Bench
A.K.MATHUR & AFTAB ALAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court is mandated to formulate and record substantial questions of law before admitting a second appeal. In this case, the High Court failed to do so, leading to the Supreme Court setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter back for proper consideration of the substantial questions of law. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court was directed to hear the second appeal afresh after framing the necessary questions of law.

A.K. SHARMA vs CHAIRMAN/M.D.,HPGCL . · Niyam