PRAVIN vs STATE OF M.P.

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Praveen under Section 395 IPC for dacoity, along with Sections 397 and 450 IPC, and Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act. The Court emphasized that the evidence presented, including eyewitness accounts and the modus operandi of the crime, sufficiently established the appellant's involvement in the armed robbery. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to uphold the conviction and sentence.