Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-04

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, T.N. vs M/S VINAYAGA BODY BUILDING INDUS. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/8952
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, T.N.
Respondent
M/S VINAYAGA BODY BUILDING INDUS. LTD.
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR S.B. SINHA
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the classification of motor cabs under the Central Excise Act, 1944, specifically interpreting Note 3 of Chapter 87. The Court held that the respondent's body building activities on duty paid chassis constituted 'manufacture' under the Act, and thus the classification under Sub-Heading 8702.90 was incorrect as it was subject to National Calamity Contingency Duty (NCCD). The appeal was dismissed, affirming the demand for duty and penalties imposed by the authorities under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act.

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, T.N. vs M/S VINAYAGA BODY BUILDING INDUS. LTD. · Niyam