CHAMAN LAL vs H.U.D.A.

The Supreme Court held that the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission erred in reversing the District Forum's order which had already been implemented, including the allotment of an alternative plot and refund of the balance amount to the appellants. The Court emphasized that once the order of the District Forum was executed, it should not have been set aside without due consideration. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, restoring the District Forum's order and setting aside the decisions of the National and State Commissions.