DEO NARAYAN YADAV vs MD. JAINUL ABEDDIN @ MD. JAINUL .

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning the applicability of sub-Section (10) versus sub-Section (7) of Section 48E of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, determining that if the order was made under sub-Section (10), it would not be appealable under Section 48F. The Court set aside the High Court's order, condoned the delay in filing Bataidari Appeal No.24/98, and restored the appeal for consideration by the Collector, emphasizing that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the case.