Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-27

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV.AUTHORITY vs GURMAIL SINGH .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/30588
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV.AUTHORITY
Respondent
GURMAIL SINGH .
Bench
R V RAVEENDRAN & P. SATHASIVAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Authority and the Revisional Authority, which restored the allotment of a site to the respondents after quashing the resumption order by the Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (PUPDA). The Court found that the respondents were not liable for interest or penalty during the period when possession was not delivered, as per the terms of the allotment letter. The Court affirmed that the concurrent findings of the lower authorities were correct and did not warrant interference.

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV.AUTHORITY vs GURMAIL SINGH . · Niyam