Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-14

MUMTAZ YUNUS MULANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/29723
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MUMTAZ YUNUS MULANI
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR S.B. SINHA
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the issue of compassionate appointment under the Government Order dated 31st December 2002, emphasizing that such appointments are meant to alleviate the immediate financial distress of the deceased employee's family. The Court held that the appellant's receipt of a family pension and other income from immovable properties disqualified her from being appointed on compassionate grounds, as the purpose of such appointments is to address sudden financial crises. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

MUMTAZ YUNUS MULANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam