Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-10

CHAIRMAN/SECY.,URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST vs MADHU SUDAN PUROHIT .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/24535
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHAIRMAN/SECY.,URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST
Respondent
MADHU SUDAN PUROHIT .
Bench
ASHOK BHAN & DALVEER BHANDARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allowing a writ petition against the auction of commercial plots near the Old Bikaner City wall, which was previously declared a protected area. The Court noted that the High Court failed to provide adequate reasoning for its decision and remanded the case for a fresh decision in accordance with law. The judgment emphasizes the need for proper justification in judicial decisions, particularly when public interest and urban planning are involved.

CHAIRMAN/SECY.,URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST vs MADHU SUDAN PUROHIT . · Niyam