Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-31

DIRECTOR, HORTICULTURE PUNJAB vs JAGJIVAN PARSHAD

Citation / case number
SC 2005/20759
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DIRECTOR, HORTICULTURE PUNJAB
Respondent
JAGJIVAN PARSHAD
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM,AFTAB ALAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Punjab and Haryana High Court's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the Labour Court's Award under Section 10(1)(C) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was unsustainable due to lack of reasoning. The Court emphasized the necessity for courts to provide clear reasons in their judgments, especially when contentious issues are involved. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, highlighting the non-application of mind in the absence of a reasoned judgment.

DIRECTOR, HORTICULTURE PUNJAB vs JAGJIVAN PARSHAD · Niyam