Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-25

STATE OF U.P. vs PRAMOD KUMAR SHUKLA

Citation / case number
SC 2005/17367
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
PRAMOD KUMAR SHUKLA
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court's decision regarding the recovery of Rs. 21,27,551.13 from Pramod Kumar Shukla under Section 12(1) of the U.P. Entertainment Tax Act, 1979, due to fraudulent misrepresentation of ownership of a cinema hall. The Court found that Shukla had concealed critical facts and misled authorities to obtain grants and permissions unlawfully. The ruling affirmed the application of Section 5(3) of the U.P. Cinema Regulation Act, 1955, and Section 21 of the U.P. General Clauses Act, 1904, in the context of the fraudulent actions taken by Shukla.

STATE OF U.P. vs PRAMOD KUMAR SHUKLA · Niyam