Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-05

GOWRISHANKARA SWAMIGALU vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Citation / case number
SC 2004/4590
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GOWRISHANKARA SWAMIGALU
Respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the allegations of unnatural offences under Section 377 IPC against the appellant, a junior Swamiji of Sri Siddaganga Mutt. The Court emphasized the need for prompt investigation and timely filing of FIRs, noting that the delay in lodging the complaint and the subsequent investigation raised questions about the credibility of the evidence. Ultimately, the Court upheld the conviction of the appellant, affirming the lower court's findings and emphasizing the importance of protecting minors from sexual offences.

GOWRISHANKARA SWAMIGALU vs STATE OF KARNATAKA · Niyam