Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-07

PRAMOD KUMAR vs U.P.SEC.EDUCATION SERVICES COM. .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/23654
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRAMOD KUMAR
Respondent
U.P.SEC.EDUCATION SERVICES COM. .
Author
S.B. SINHA
Bench
S.B. SINHA,HARJIT SINGH BEDI, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that appointments of teachers in Uttar Pradesh must adhere to the qualifications and procedures outlined in the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982, specifically Section 16, which mandates that all appointments be made on the Board's recommendations. The Court emphasized that any appointment made contrary to this provision is void. The appellant's qualifications were scrutinized under the Act and the Rules, leading to the conclusion that his B.Ed. degree from Maithili Vishwa Vidyapeeth did not meet the necessary criteria for appointment as an Assistant Teacher.

PRAMOD KUMAR vs U.P.SEC.EDUCATION SERVICES COM. . · Niyam