Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-03

D.G., RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE vs K. RAGHURAM BABU

Citation / case number
SC 2002/8626
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
D.G., RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE
Respondent
K. RAGHURAM BABU
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
MARKANDEY KATJU H. K. SEMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Rule 153(8) of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, which restricts the accused from being represented by a legal practitioner in departmental inquiries, is constitutional. The Court emphasized that in domestic inquiries, the accused must conduct their own case unless explicitly permitted by a rule. The judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court striking down Rule 153(8) was overturned, affirming that the right to self-representation is fundamental in such proceedings, as established in N. Kalindi vs. M/s. Tata Locomotive and Engineering Co. Ltd. and Brook Bond India vs. Subba Raman.

D.G., RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE vs K. RAGHURAM BABU · Niyam