Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-05

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH vs M/S. GURDASPUR DISTILLERY

Citation / case number
SC 2002/12000
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH
Respondent
M/S. GURDASPUR DISTILLERY
Bench
ASHOK BHAN & DALVEER BHANDARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Methane gas produced and used captively by the respondent is not liable to excise duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944, specifically under Section 11A(I) and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, as it is not marketable. The Court emphasized that marketability is a crucial criterion for the imposition of excise duty, referencing the precedent in Bhor Industries Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the findings of the lower authorities that the gas in question was not marketable and thus not subject to excise duty.

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH vs M/S. GURDASPUR DISTILLERY · Niyam