Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-04

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Xpro India Ltd

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2008 SC 136
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Income Tax
Respondent
Xpro India Ltd
Bench
S.H. Kapadia, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the Department's appeal regarding the interpretation of Section 115 JAA and its relation to Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that a substantial question of law arose concerning the nature of the levy under Section 234B, whether it is penal or mandatory, which the High Court failed to address. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the Civil Appeal, set aside the impugned judgment, and directed the High Court to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Xpro India Ltd · Niyam