Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-13

B.S.N.L. & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Saxena

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2952
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.S.N.L. & Ors
Respondent
Rajesh Kumar Saxena
Author
Harjit Singh Bedi
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 10 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1965, suspension does not constitute a punishment and evaporates upon superannuation. The Court ruled that the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Saxena, is entitled to provisional pension and release of provident fund, but other retiral benefits must await the outcome of ongoing disciplinary proceedings. The appeal was allowed to this extent, modifying the High Court's order regarding the release of benefits.

B.S.N.L. & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Saxena · Niyam