Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-11

Chander Kanta Bansal vs Rajinder Singh Anand

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2234
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chander Kanta Bansal
Respondent
Rajinder Singh Anand
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the trial court's order allowing the amendment of the written statement under Order VI Rule 17 and Section 151 CPC. The Court emphasized that amendments should not be allowed if they introduce a new case or change the nature of the original case, which was the situation here as the appellant sought to introduce a forged document. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the amendment was not permissible.

Chander Kanta Bansal vs Rajinder Singh Anand · Niyam