Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-07

Yogesh Ramchandra Naikwadi vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 1784
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Yogesh Ramchandra Naikwadi
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Bench
K. G. Balakrishnan, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the principle that a degree obtained by a candidate, even if their claim to belong to a Scheduled Tribe is rejected, should not be annulled if the candidate has completed their course and the admission was granted provisionally. Citing precedents from State of Maharashtra v. Milind (2001) and R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala (2004), the Court emphasized that annulling the degree would not serve any beneficial purpose and would deprive society of the services of qualified professionals. The appeal was allowed, affirming the retention of the degree while clarifying that the appellant cannot claim Scheduled Tribe benefits in the future.

Yogesh Ramchandra Naikwadi vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam