Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-14

M.S.D.C. Radharamanan vs M.S.D. Chandrasekara Raja And Another

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 1738
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.S.D.C. Radharamanan
Respondent
M.S.D. Chandrasekara Raja And Another
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Company Law Board has the authority to address acts of oppression and deadlock in company affairs. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the Company Law Board was justified in directing the appellant to purchase shares from the first respondent due to the deadlock situation, emphasizing the need for resolution to ensure smooth company operations. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the earlier order to facilitate share valuation and purchase.

M.S.D.C. Radharamanan vs M.S.D. Chandrasekara Raja And Another · Niyam