Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-03-31

Ramesh Chand And Anr vs Ghaziabad Development Authority And ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ramesh Chand And Anr
Respondent
Ghaziabad Development Authority And ...
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's failure to decide an application for additional evidence under Order 41, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure during the disposal of a second appeal was improper. The Court emphasized that such applications must be addressed concurrently with the appeal, leading to the remittance of the case back to the High Court for a fresh decision. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the case was directed to be resolved within two months, ensuring adherence to procedural requirements.

Ramesh Chand And Anr vs Ghaziabad Development Authority And ... · Niyam