Deo Narayan Yadav vs Md. Jainul Abeddin @ Md. Jainul @ Md. ...

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning the applicability of sub-Sections (10) and (7) of Section 48E of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, determining that if the order was made under sub-Section (10), it would not be appealable under Section 48F, whereas an order under sub-Sections (7) and (8) would allow for an appeal. The Court set aside the High Court's order, condoned the delay in filing the Bataidari Appeal No.24/98, and restored it for consideration by the Collector, emphasizing that no opinion on the merits was expressed.