Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-29

NUNE PRASAD vs NUNE RAMAKRISNA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/24121
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NUNE PRASAD
Respondent
NUNE RAMAKRISNA
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's judgment allowing a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC was invalid as it failed to formulate a substantial question of law, which is a prerequisite for such appeals. The Court emphasized that the High Court must adhere to the procedural requirements established by Section 100 CPC, particularly post the 1976 Amendment. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the matter for reconsideration in accordance with the law.

NUNE PRASAD vs NUNE RAMAKRISNA · Niyam