Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-11

PERUMON BHAGVATHY DEVASWOM PERINADU VILL vs BHARGAVI AMMA (D) THR. LRS.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/2247
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PERUMON BHAGVATHY DEVASWOM PERINADU VILL
Respondent
BHARGAVI AMMA (D) THR. LRS.
Author
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, , ,
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the dismissal of applications to set aside the abatement of a second appeal due to the death of a respondent, focusing on the provisions of Order 22 CPC. The Court held that the High Court erred in not condoning the delay of 394 days in filing the application, as the delay was satisfactorily explained by the appellant, a Devoswom managed by a newly elected committee unaware of the appeal's pendency. The Court emphasized that under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC, the appeal should not abate if the right to sue survives, and directed the High Court to reconsider the applications.

PERUMON BHAGVATHY DEVASWOM PERINADU VILL vs BHARGAVI AMMA (D) THR. LRS. · Niyam